by Marco Respinti
Media institutions undeniably wield substantial influence in religious liberty. The general public can, in fact, become aware of human rights violations worldwide—particularly in uncommon or sensitive contexts—only through media reporting. This primary responsibility of the media, however, becomes culpability when inaccurate or deliberately misleading coverage distorts public understanding of religious phenomena. Persistent misrepresentation and selective framing shape societal perceptions and produce especially detrimental effects on religious minorities, which consequently suffer a double injustice: first, from the violations they endure, and second, from the gratuitous stigma generated by superficial or hostile media portrayals. Moreover, the consequences of media distortions extend far beyond the audiences who read newspapers, watch TV, listen to radio shows, or follow online media. They shape policymakers’ attitudes, institutional responses, and ultimately the formulation of policy itself.

Read the full article here